Hi BusyBox maintainers,
I’m preparing a small OSS-Fuzz integration effort for BusyBox
and wanted to check if you’d be open to fuzzing harnesses
living in-tree.
The initial idea is a small directory with a `make fuzzers` target
(not built by default), and a couple of tiny harnesses focused on
libbb parsers (base64/base32 to start, then higher‑value parsers
like archives/volume_id/httpd parsing).
OSS-Fuzz can then fuzz continuously at no cost, finding bugs
before they become active exploits.
Would this be welcome upstream? Happy to answer any questions.
Thanks,
Leslie
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
