i would prefer to re-visit the whole topic (see our previous objections). regards, gerhard
2011/9/7 Matt Benson <[email protected]> > I think something is off with our logging (ugh, I know) dependencies. > We depend on commons-beanutils (in and of itself a situation about > which I'm personally not so thrilled, TBH), which in turn depends on > commons-logging, but for the fact that we exclude this dependency. > This places a burden on the user to know that he must account for > commons-logging in some fashion, with no indication to that effect. > It would seem more proper to remove the exclusion so that the user > *sees* the transitive dependency and can decide how to handle it if he > wants to exclude/replace it. > > Thoughts? > > Matt >
