we are currently discussing it in the eg. maybe we should just wait for [1].
regards, gerhard [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/type-annotations/ http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/5/7 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > I honestly think this goes into the wrong direction. > This is business logic, and if we start to provide annotations for all > those kinds of problems, it will end up getting terribly complicated. > > I'd prefer to keep it simple and stupid. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > >Von: Carlos Vara <[email protected]> > >An: [email protected] > >Gesendet: Freitag, den 7. Mai 2010, 10:57:11 Uhr > >Betreff: An interesting post about validating collections > > > >http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/AValidationStickler > > > >Currently as an user, I was solving this by writing custom validators, > which it seems is no more of a hack than the other proposed solutions > (except the one that implies waiting for JDK7 to hopefully implement > JSR-308). > > > >Any of you guys have an idea of how we could implement it? > > > > >
