hi rudy, maybe we should think about both. providing a (different) default group for a constraint sounds useful (maybe even for bv 1.1) if you have a constraint which is (by definition) only useful for a specific group (in most or all cases).
regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2011/7/22 Rudy De Busscher <[email protected]> > Hi Gerhard, > > Disabling the standard requirements for just an add on of ExtVal seems a > bit too drastic, but a transformer seems a good idea. I'll try to make > something and post it. > > Regards > Rudy. > > > On 18 July 2011 21:58, Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>wrote: > >> hi rudy, >> >> we could discuss a bval feature which relaxes such rules (it would be >> deactivated by default). >> or something like transformer for constraints. >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> http://www.irian.at >> >> Your JSF powerhouse - >> JSF Consulting, Development and >> Courses in English and German >> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> >> >> 2011/7/18 Rudy De Busscher <[email protected]> >> >>> hi All, >>> >>> The situation is a bit difficult to describe both I have a use case where >>> I would like to create a custom validation annotation where I need to define >>> a non empty groups attribute >>> >>> something like this >>> *@Target(value = { ElementType.FIELD}) >>> @Retention(value = RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) >>> @Constraint(validatedBy = { EqualsValidator.class }) >>> public @interface Equals >>> { >>> String message() default "{duplicated_content_required}"; >>> >>> Class<?>[] groups() default {CrossValidationGroup.class}; >>> >>> Class<? extends Payload>[] payload() default {}; >>> >>> String[] value(); >>> } >>> * >>> >>> But as expected, I get a error when I try to use the annotation: >>> Default value for groups() must be an empty array >>> >>> But I want to avoid that the user needs to define it always when he uses >>> the annotation. >>> * @Equals(value = "caseSensitiveTarget", groups = >>> CrossValidationGroup.class) >>> private String caseSensitiveSource;* >>> >>> >>> Any idea or direction I need to look into are apreciated. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> -- >>> Rudy De Busscher >>> http://www.c4j.be >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Rudy De Busscher > http://www.c4j.be > >
