Just haveing fun michael. Don't take it so seriously.

Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy® Note 4.

-------- Original message --------
From: Michael Monsour via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> 
Date: 4/1/17  9:42 PM  (GMT-06:00) 
To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <bvarc@bvarc.org> 
Cc: Michael Monsour <msi...@gmail.com>, JP Pritchard <jppn...@comcast.net> 
Subject: Re: [BVARC] FCC action!! 

Enough with the April 1st junk

On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 9:03 PM, JP Pritchard via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:
I know this is crap since the federal government would never say in a press 
release that it had made a big mistake. Nice try Chris. You're an April fool.



JP



Sent from my iPhone



> On Apr 1, 2017, at 8:45 PM, Chris Boone via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:

>

> FCC to reinstate Morse Code test

>

> Washington, D.C. – April 1, 2017 –

>

> Today, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission or FCC) approved 
> Report and Order 14-987af which reinstates the Morse Code test for General 
> Class and Amateur Extra Class licensees.

>

> “It was a big mistake eliminating the Morse Code test,” admits Dotty Dasher, 
> the FCC’s director of examinations. “We now realize that being able to send 
> and receive Morse Code is an essential skill for radio amateurs. As they say, 
> it really does get through when other modes can’t.”

>

> Not only will new applicants have to take the test, but General Class 
> licensees who have never passed a code test will have one year to pass a 
> 5-wpm code test. Similarly, Amateur Extra class licensees that never passed a 
> code test will have one year to pass a 13-wpm test. Those amateurs that fail 
> to pass the test will face revocation of their operating privileges. 
> Materials for administering the examinations will be distributed to Volunteer 
> Examiner Coordinators by the end of April, so that they can begin the testing 
> on May 1, 2017.

>

> “This isn’t going to be one of those silly multiple-choice type tests,” noted 
> Dasher. “We’re going to be sending five-character random code groups, just 
> like we did in the old days. And, applicants will have to prove that they can 
> send, too, using a poorly adjusted straight key.”

>

> Technician Class licensees will not be required to take a Morse Code test, 
> nor will a test be required for new applicants. “We discussed it,” said 
> Dasher, “but decided that since most Techs can’t even figure out how to 
> program their HTs, requiring them to learn Morse Code seemed like cruel and 
> unusual punishment.”

>

> When asked what other actions we might see from the FCC, Dasher hinted that 
> in the future applicants taking the written exam may be required to draw 
> circuit diagrams, such as Colpitts oscillators and diode ring mixers, once 
> again. “We’re beginning to think that if an applicant passes an amateur radio 
> license exam it should mean that he or she actually knows something,” she 
> said.

> ________________________________

> Cumulus Media Disclaimer

> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
> individual(s) named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
> this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are 
> notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
> reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

> _______________________________________________

> BVARC mailing list

> BVARC@bvarc.org

> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

> Message delivered to jppn...@comcast.net





_______________________________________________

BVARC mailing list

BVARC@bvarc.org

http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

Message delivered to msi...@gmail.com



_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to