Hi,
no need to CC me, I'm subscribed.
On 04/10/2013 10:44 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
On 4/10/13 10:03 AM, Alexander Klauer wrote:
On 03/18/2013 09:26 AM, Alexander Klauer wrote:
On 03/15/2013 08:26 PM, Yang Tse wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013, Alexander Klauer
<alexander.kla...@itwm.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
This commit updates the documentation of ares_library_init() and
ares_library_cleanup() with regard to the new recursive behaviour.
It might be better to use "Its reference counted
initialize/deinitialize behavior," or something similar, instead of
"Its recursive behavior,"
OK, I've updated the commit.
Any further comments? If not, could this patchset be committed, please?
TIA.
I'm no expert, but I thought I'd throw my 2 cents here :-) What about
using something like pthread_once? Would that work for you? Not sure if
that's supported in all platforms though.
That would work on systems where it's supported, but unfortunately, it's
not portable. Since one of the points of having an asynchronous resolver
is not having to deal with threads in the first place, I'd be loath to
import a dependency on a threading library into c-ares.
Best regards,
Alexander
