On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
> Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
> >
> >>If the users can only have their INBOX on imap but not any other
> >>folders what do they gain from this change.
> >
> > They can move mails back and forth to and from the server, which is
> > impossible with pop.
>
> What's the point if they can only upload mails to their inbox
> but not create other folders as that's what the orginal poster
> wants. IMO better stay with POP3, that's less confusion for the
> users and change to IMAP when the server got more harddisk space
> to be able to hold all user folders.
You can f.ex synchronize your folders between various workstations. Which
you can't with POP.
*t
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux & Open Source Solutions
http://sourcepole.ch
Elestastrasse 18, 7310 Bad Ragaz, Switzerland
Tel: +41 (81) 330 77 11
-----------------------------------------------------------
