On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Samisa, > > Apparently the source pack is corrupt. I tried to extract it on Windows but > failed. Please check. > Um, did you try to extract tar on windows? > > Thanks, > Danushka > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe <[email protected]>wrote: > >> http://people.apache.org/~samisa/axis2c-1.7.0-RC3/ >> >> I have the source and Linux binary pack in there. I need someone to help >> with the Windows pack. >> >> I applied all patches that I could to this pack. So we are almost ready to >> go after a test round. >> >> Thanks, >> Samisa... >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I just had a look at these pathces, and it seems to me that there >>> would not be any side effects. So I am +1 to ship these patches. >>> >>> Samisa... >>> >>> On Wednesday, September 1, 2010, Steve Leland <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > During the 8 years I was on the Domino web server team I never really >>> appreciated customers telling me what my top priority should be - and now >>> that I'm on the other side, as your customer, I don't want to make the same >>> mistake. But it looks like you are close to calling for a vote on 1.7, and >>> I think there's something that might have been overlooked - I hope bringing >>> it up via this list is OK. >>> > >>> > BinaryTree ships a product that uses Axis2c 1.6, and staticly links in >>> OpenSSL (since Domino installs with its own versions of the OpenSSL dlls). I >>> spent a considerable amount time getting it to run without leaking any >>> memory. When the time comes, it will be much easier to convince the boss to >>> upgrade to 1.7 if I don't have to go through that again. The biggest leak I >>> found had already been reported in JIRA -1237 - and I added 3 very small >>> patches to fix it. >>> > >>> > I know that's not your top priority, but it's one of mine - could I >>> just put in a plea that you consider them for the 1.7 release? >>> > >>> > [ >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-1237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12883168#action_12883168] >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > Steve Leland >>> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar" < >>> [email protected]> >>> > To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <[email protected]>; "Apache >>> AXIS C User List" <[email protected]> >>> > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 2:04 AM >>> > Subject: Axis2/C 1.7.0 - RC2 >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Hi Devs, >>> > >>> > You can find Axis2/C RC2 in [1]. Please test and give your feedback. >>> > RAT report is in [2]. There are some files[3] (mostly visual studio >>> > project files) excluded from the RAT report. Also, generated API >>> > documents (doxygen documents) and Makefile.in files are not having any >>> > headers. Since they are generated files, we can omit them. >>> > >>> > If they are fine, can start a format voting thread. >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > Shankar >>> > >>> > [1] http://people.apache.org/~shankar/axis2c/1.7.0-RC2/ >>> > [2] http://people.apache.org/~shankar/axis2c/1.7.0-RC2/rat-report.txt >>> > [3] http://people.apache.org/~shankar/axis2c/1.7.0-RC2/rat-avoid.txt >>> > >>> > -- >>> > S.Uthaiyashankar >>> > Senior Software Architect >>> > WSO2 Inc. >>> > http://wso2.com/ - "lean . enterprise . middleware" >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> >
