Nice!

Ok, I have commit access, I can help with that.

Let's keep in touch.

Rafael

Em 21/03/2017 21:22, "Bill Blough" <[email protected]> escreveu:

Sounds good to me.

I don't have commit access, so I've been opening a Jira ticket for each
logical unit of work and then attaching a patch.

I'll work on adding GTest to the current autotools build system.

Bill

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 08:21:48PM -0300, Rafael Bronzeri wrote:
> I prefer add GTest support to the current build system, we think about
convert
> to CMake later.
>
> Let Visual Studio with me, I will do that.
>
> I'm using official Axis2C Jira, so you can see what I'm doing, but I
don't have
> privilege to close Tickets (Tasks), but I'm inserting the comments.
>
> Rafael Bronzeri
>
>
> Em 21/03/2017 16:17, "Bill Blough" <[email protected]> escreveu:
>
>     Hi Rafael,
>
>     I don't have a Windows system, so any work for Visual Studio would
need
>     to be done by someone else.
>
>     So far, all the patches I've submitted have been against the current
>     autotools-based build system.  Likewise, I had planned on adding GTest
>     support to the current build system.
>
>     I know migrating to CMake is on the roadmap, but since no one else
seemed
>     very active, and since I know autotools far better than CMake, I
figured
>     I'd be able to contribute more, faster, if I left CMake for later.
>
>     But that was all based on me doing much of the work alone. If you're
>     going to have time to contribute, too, then I don't have a problem
with
>     changing the approach in order to enable us to better work together.
>
>     Would you prefer we convert to CMake first?
>
>     Bill
>
>
>     On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 03:06:52PM -0300, Rafael Bronzeri wrote:
>     > Hi Bill,
>     >
>     > I didn't work on Axis2C lately.
>     > I had started the adjustments of the Axis2C build, for Visual Studio
>     2017, but
>     > I not commited the source yet.
>     >
>     > At the moment, I can work few hours/week, about 3 hours.
>     >
>     > Do you intend integrate GTest on Make projects and Visual Studio
>     solutions? Or
>     > lets change to CMake?
>     >
>     > Rafael Bronzeri
>     >
>     > Em 20/03/2017 17:07, "Bill Blough" <[email protected]> escreveu:
>     >
>     >     Hi Rafael,
>     >
>     >     It's been a couple of weeks - have you made any progress on
this?
>     >
>     >     I've not been feeling well, so I haven't had much ability to
work on
>     Axis,
>     >     but hope to get going again soon. Having gtest integrated will
allow
>     me
>     >     to work on adding new unit tests as well as porting existing
tests.
>     >
>     >     If you don't have time, that's fine, I can do it.  But I don't
want
>     to
>     >     duplicate effort, so I thought I'd check if you're working on
it.
>     >
>     >     Best regards,
>     >     Bill
>     >
>     >     On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:22:10PM -0200, Rafael Bronzeri wrote:
>     >     > Hi Bill,
>     >     >
>     >     > I think that include the GTest (Google Test) is a great idea!
>     >     >
>     >     > I've never saw any restrictions about it, but I don't know
where to
>     find
>     >     some
>     >     > documentation about it.
>     >     >
>     >     > I can help include GTest on Axis2C.
>     >     >
>     >     > Best Regards,
>     >     >
>     >     > Rafael Bronzeri
>     >     >
>     >     > Em 04/03/2017 15:10, "Bill Blough" <[email protected]> escreveu:
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >     Google Test is under a pretty permissive license, so we
could
>     include
>     >     it
>     >     >     in the axis2c distribution as a convenience.  However,
I'm not
>     sure
>     >     what
>     >     >     the ASF policy is on this.
>     >     >
>     >     >     Can anyone comment on whether this is allowed and/or a
good/bad
>     idea,
>     >     or
>     >     >     point me to documentation stating that this is or isn't
>     allowed?  So
>     >     far
>     >     >     I haven't been able to find anything helpful via search.
>     >     >
>     >     >     Thanks,
>     >     >     Bill
>     >     >
>     >     >     -----------------------------
------------------------------
>     ----------
>     >     >     To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>     >     >     For additional commands, e-mail:
[email protected]
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >
>     >     -----------------------------------------------------------
----------
>     >     To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>     >     For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>     For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to