> > As a result, I don't see much benefit
> > from using a more complex -version-info over the simpler -release.
> 
> One is wrong, one is right. It's simply that direct at the moment. It may
be
> that you can get -release to give you output consistent with the 2.x
build,
> but right now it's not.

And per my last note, I see now that's too strong...-release has a purpose
and it's working as intended, but that purpose is to prevent any binary
compatibility between library versions.

If that's not what you intend, then you should switch it to -version-info.
So it should be a simple calculus, and I'll adjust the specfile as needed.

-- Scott



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to