On 4/26/17, 4:04 AM, "Roger Leigh" <rle...@codelibre.net> wrote:
> Agreed that just moving up to C++98 standard types in and of itself > would be greatly beneficial. There should be no portability barrier to > achieving that. No, definitely not. I've been using the STL and Boost for years now on many platforms. > Regarding portability, I also have the "pleasure" of supporting code on > CentOS 6. I don't know if you've tried it, but we switched to using the > SCL "devtoolset-3" (now "devtoolset-4") packages which backport a modern > GCC and the rest of the toolchain to CentOS6 (and 7). Do the packages built from that work on an unmodified CentOS 6 system? Meaning does it pull in any dependencies for that from the standard repos? The change that's really relevant for me is that Red Hat 5 dropped out of standard support in March, so that was a major switch. Unfortunately I also have many older SUSE versions to support also. -- Scott --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org