Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net> writes: > nullptr is a language keyword, so that should just have worked. Unless > an older language standard was being explicitly forced, the use of > nullptr should be benign.
nullptr was added in C++11 so by using it you effectively drop support for C++98/03. I personally don't mind dropping this support but I think it should be a bit more formal than "ops, we just dropped C++98/03 accidentally". I.e., a vote and a note in the release notes would be a good idea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org
