> On 1/14/07, Bilal Jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i have heard that standard C++ is not windows compitable!
What is 'compitable'? > > wt does this mean. Thanks Yoda, but what is wt? "Brett W. McCoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Who told you that??!?!?!? They're wrong. Standard C++ is OS > independent... it depends on a compiler to conform to the > standard. Yes but how do you write a conforming hosted C++ implementation for an OS that goes out its way to prevent you? [The OP may have heard about the issues surrounding Managed C++ in Windows. ... Or maybe they're using Turbo C++ v1.0b... ;-] -- Peter
