At 13:35 2007-01-15, Nuno Berneaud wrote: >Hello Ray > >On 15 Jan 2007, you wrote: > > > If you plan on going to C++ eventially, why not learn > > the "basic stuff" in C++ instead of learning about > > scanf, printf, malloc, etc which have been replaced in > > C++. > >That is probably my problem: I don't know if I'm going forward (C++) >afterwards. >C is the "official" language on my machine, not sure if C++ compatibility is >100% working.
what machine?? >Anyway, it seems pretty much consensuous that, for long term, C++ is >the better >choice. I'm going to hunt for a basic C++ book, see if I click with it. My >experience so far has been almost non-existent. C I can understand, but C++ >seems more complicated, so to speak. > >So, thanks for all your answers, hope to report later to show what (and if) I >learned. ;) > >Bye, > >Nuno > > > >To unsubscribe, send a blank message to ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"
