At 07:54 2007-01-30, chetan verma wrote:
Nuno Berneaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello.
On 29 Jan 2007, you wrote:
> BTW, found this in Bjarne's C++ FAQ:
> Why is the code generated for the "Hello world" program ten times
> larger for C++ than for C?
> It isn't on my machine, and it shouldn't be on yours. I have even
> seen the C++ version of the "hello world" program smaller than the C
> version. When I recently (2004) tested using gcc -o2 on a Unix, the
> two versions (iostreams and stdio) yielded identical sizes. There is
> no language reason why the one version should be larger than the
> other. It is all an issue on how the implementor organized the
> libraries. If one version is significantly larger than the other,
> report the problem to the implementor of the larger.
I've tried the Bjarne's "hello world" example, too, and was
surprised to see the
executable was almost 4MB! 5 lines of code, a couple includes, isn't it a bit
too much?
Bye,
Nuno
,_._,___
;
It is too much.
On my compiler (mingw) i got 464 KB executable for the <iostream>
version and 15.2 KB for the <cstdio> and <stdio.h> versions.
are you SURE you used the -o2 option?
if so, then the folks working on g++ have forgotten how to build a library
-chetan.
No need to miss a message.
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=43910/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail>Get
email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile.
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=43910/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail>Get
started.
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
