>I realise that the generated code is probably identical, but if a language >provides a simpler way of doing something, I think you have to have a good >reason >for not using it. I'm with you there, I'm just stating that there isn't a benafit over using that, other than easier readability--it own't boost performance. I'm not sure if the OP would've known or even cared to ask, was just stating it in case he cared or if it helped. :)
Thanks, Tyler Littlefield Web: tysdomain.com email: [email protected] My programs don't have bugs, they're called randomly added features. ----- Original Message ----- From: John Matthews To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 8:17 AM Subject: [c-prog] Re: Bit Operator --- In [email protected], "Tyler Littlefield" <ty...@...> wrote: > > >But the following does the same thing and is also safe, and is what I think you should use: > it doesn't really matter, just makes it quicker coding. :) I realise that the generated code is probably identical, but if a language provides a simpler way of doing something, I think you have to have a good reason for not using it. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
