Didn't know that. Even if the process end before executing a new one ? Maybe it's not so critical because my simulations takes many minutes and I'm not looking for precision within seconds. I don't know which percentage of processing time would be affected by this behavior.
Thomas Hruska a écrit : > > Stephane Lesoinne wrote: > > Right, no fork under Windows. > > > > And I don't want to have multiple instances of the executable running > > concurrently. > > My goal is to run multiple simulations varying the parameters and check > > the execution time. So each simulation should all have the same > > processing power all the time which is definitely not guaranteed with > > too much process time slicing. ;-) > > > > Stéphane Lesoinne > > Assistant > > INTELSIG group - Département E.E.I. > > Université de Liege B28 > > B-4000 Sart-Tilman (Liege 1) - Belgium > > Tel +32 4 3662652 > > Fax +32 4 3662649 > > You should note that the first couple of times a process runs under > Windows, the OS is going to spend most of its time loading the process > and its dependencies. After that, things will be cached. So your first > few runs won't be very accurate. > > -- > Thomas Hruska > CubicleSoft President > Ph: 517-803-4197 > > *NEW* MyTaskFocus 1.1 > Get on task. Stay on task. > > http://www.CubicleSoft.com/MyTaskFocus/ > <http://www.CubicleSoft.com/MyTaskFocus/> > >
