Right :) 2009/4/11 Paul Herring <[email protected]>
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Christopher Coale > <[email protected]<chris95219%40gmail.com>> > wrote: > > I'm not sure if you are just using that code to make a point, but that > > won't work. You are getting the size of the pointer (which is usually 4 > > or 8 bytes), and dividing that by the size of the type. > > That's exactly the point they were originally making - i.e. it doesn't > work because it's a pointer to an array being passed in, not the > original array itself. > > -- > PJH > > http://shabbleland.myminicity.com/ind > http://www.chavgangs.com/register.php?referer=9375 > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
