i hope you read them -this is true as i tried them many times if you have
another opinion illustrate it
thanks
Eng A.Mahmoud
--- On Thu, 5/28/09, John Matthews <[email protected]> wrote:
From: John Matthews <[email protected]>
Subject: [c-prog] Re: confusing output
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 9:25 AM
--- In c-p...@yahoogroups. com, Ahmed Mahmoud <eng_hamada2585@ ...> wrote:
>
> i think the two codes will give the same result -this is as i tried
> it- as
> m++ means: the operation will first be done and then the increase by one
> will occur
> ++m means:the increasing by one will occur and then the operation will will
> be done
> by substituting by this
> 1- v=0+5+(1+(5+ 1))=12
> 2-v=5+(1+(5+ 1))=12
> as 0+ anything =anything
> Thanks
> Eng A.Mahmoud
Please read the previous posts in this thread which explain why this
explanation is incorrect.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
