--- In [email protected], "John Matthews" <jm5...@...> wrote: > > Also, rachQIndex should *not* be incremented at the end of the loop if the UE > is deleted
...or should there just be a break to exit the loop when the UE is deleted?
--- In [email protected], "John Matthews" <jm5...@...> wrote: > > Also, rachQIndex should *not* be incremented at the end of the loop if the UE > is deleted
...or should there just be a break to exit the loop when the UE is deleted?