On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Sandip Tujare<[email protected]> wrote:
> > int m=1; > > m=m++ + m++ + ++m + ++m; > Answer of this program is 14 because here order of evaluation of the > statement is right to left. I rest my case. This is wrong. "Order of evaluation" relates to the + signs, not the bits in-between the + signs. Specifically the ++ operators may be evaluated in any order (from right to left for example, but not necessarily. Doing so would result in 12.) Adding parenthesis will not change this (to preempt the next answer...) -- PJH http://shabbleland.myminicity.com/ http://www.chavgangs.com/register.php?referer=9375 http://www.kongregate.com/?referrer=Shabble
