Sorry here is the correct code in that send to is not returning any thing
void ipifSend(VTASK * vtask)
{
VARIABLE_STR *var = (VARIABLE_STR *) vtask->var;
/* int ret, i; */
int ret;
if (!var->frameLen)
{
printf ("\nIPIF: ipifSend: no data to send var->frameLen = 0\n");
return;
}
if (var->ip_addr.family == AF_INET) {
struct sockaddr_in saddr;
memset(&saddr, 0, sizeof(saddr));
saddr.sin_family = AF_INET;
saddr.sin_addr.s_addr = var->ip_addr.ipv4;
ret = sendto(var->socket_id, var->outBuff, var->frameLen, 0,
(struct sockaddr *) &saddr, sizeof(saddr));
printf ("\nDKu: IPIF: ipifSend: sendto returned %d \n", ret);
if (ret > 0)
return;
}
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Ravi Mishra <[email protected]> wrote:
> here we go:
>
> ////////////////////////////////////////
> Ravi:IPIF:block->data208820968: ^M
> process terminated by watchdog^M
> process terminated by watchdog^M
> Aborted (core dumped)^M
>
> ///////////////////////some part of code//
>
> static void getIpifServParameters(
> MESSAGE * msg, /* Incoming
> message. */
> PRIMITIVE primitive, /* Incoming
> primitive number. */
> VARIABLE_STR * var)
> { /* Variable structure of phys. */
> IPIF_UP_PARAM_BLOCK *block = (IPIF_UP_PARAM_BLOCK *) msg->parameters;
>
> switch (primitive) {
> case ipif_data_send:
> var->ip_addr = block->ip_addr;
> var->socket_id = block->sockid;
> var->frameLen = frameLength(block->data);
> //printf ("\nDKu:IPIF: getIpifServParameters: pif_data_send
> :var->socket_id = %d\n",var->socket_id);
> if (!var->frameLen) {
> printf ("\nRavi:IPIF: getIpifServParameters: var->frameLen
> = 0\n");
> }
> if (var->frameLen > DEFAULT_MAXBUF)
> woutput("IPIF Error: Frame in block->data too long!\n");
> else
> readnBytes(block->data, (BYTE_TYPE *) var->outBuff,
> 1, var->frameLen);
>
> printf ("\nRavi:IPIF:block->data%d: \n",block->data);
> if (block->data)
> deleteFrame(&block->data);
>
> break;
> case ipif_open_req:
>
> //////////////
>
> here readnByte function return the no of bytes after this suddenly linux
> system watchdog kill the process.
> even if tune the kernal for avoid this thing you can see the above log and
> Ravi printing.
>
> -Ravi
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:45 PM, johnmatthews2000 <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> --- In [email protected] <c-prog%40yahoogroups.com>, Ravi Mishra
>> <ravics...@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > In my code for sending the data i am using sendData system call which is
>> > same as read().
>>
>> Could you show us your code?
>>
>>
>>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
