Around 12:20am on Thursday, February 25, 2010 (UK time), Benjamin Scott scrawled:
> According to my understanding, If a Pointer has the > value of 0, then it shows the compilier that it points > to nothing, but I thought normally NULL is defined as > 0. Surely the concept of the compiler knowing a value of a pointer is meaningless? Steve -- (o< www.stevesearle.com //\ Powered by Fedora V_/_ No MS products were used in the creation of this message 00:40:30 up 23 days, 8:12, 0 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
