On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Sam Carleton <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> What we have with Axis2/C is a SOAP engine. What you are looking for is an >> app server. >> That is out of scope as far as this project is concerned. >> > > Is this for real? I would LOVE to know how many folks outside of the > development team use Axis2/C and do NOT need some type of connection to a > database. > Now you are criticizing the dev team. You are using years of hard work for free and you still want to show attitude. Go to hell buddy, that is not how open source work!!! > > I am *NOT* asking for a app server, I am simply asking for a way to allow > information to be passed through the SOAP engine in such a way that I don't > have to worry about my hack breaking in the next release. > I am getting tired of answering these dumb questions. This is what it is. Either you use it, or you improve it, or you go to hell with it. > > Heck, I am not even asking for this parameter to EVER be used by the > default server modules, leave it to the individual to customize the server > module if they want/need the feature. As I said before, EVERY main stream > 'engine' has the ability to pass a blind pointer through the 'engine' so > that both sides can have context, except Axis2/C. > Go and use a "mainstream". Why bother using this??? I am starting to wonder how main stream it really is, maybe these types of > issues are why Apple is still using AxisC++. > > With the attitude I am getting from you all, I am started to REALLY regret > how deeply I rely on Axis2/C for my app. Such as life. > The attitude you have, what about that??? You are lucky that you are on this list and wrote this to us. You go do this on apr or httpd... Samisa...
