Hi Umesh,
I tried your testcase with Xerces 2.7, and it reports an error
('unknown element bar:bar'; which version are you using?
Alberto
At 18.58 25/07/2007 +0530, Umesh Chandak wrote:
Hi All,
Is there any precedence between processContent = strict and namespace
attribute of wildcard group.
Consider for example
**************XSD File *******************
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
targetNamespace="http://xsdtesting" xmlns:x="http://xsdtesting"
elementFormDefault="qualified">
<xsd:element name="doc">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="elem" type="x:any"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="100"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:complexType name="any">
<xsd:choice>
<xsd:any processContents="strict" namespace="foo
bar ##targetNamespace" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="100"/>
</xsd:choice>
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:element name="foo"/>
</xsd:schema>
*******************XSD End **************************
*******************XML File *************************
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<x:doc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:x="http://xsdtesting" xsi:schemaLocation="http://xsdtesting
particlesC029.xsd">
<x:elem>
<bar:bar xmlns:bar="bar"/>
</x:elem>
</x:doc>
********************XML END*****************************
1) If we go according to strict then xml is invalid because there is no
definition for 'bar:bar' element
2) If we go according to the namespace then it's valid because bar
element is from the list of namespaces 'foo bar http://xsdtesting'
Xerces says that this is the Valid instance i.e. it is going according
to namespace .
Please let me know if there is any such precedence followed in xerces.
If possible please give the reference because in spec I didn't find
anything regarding such precedence.
Thanks.
Regards,
Umesh