David Bertoni wrote:
I'm not saying it would ever happen. I simply made a statement about
what the C and C++ standards say a conforming implementation could do.
That's your words: "Standard C++ reserves <> for system headers, and
Xerces-C violates that." But standard does not restrict <>-headers
to only system headers. All it says is that ""-headers are source files
only but <>-headers are not. Usage of the <> form is the common practice
in other libraries (look at the boost library for example).
You and Vitaly insisted that the algorithm you stated is somehow
codified in the standard, and I stated that it's not.
That's my words: "(both search algorithms are implementation defined
according to the standard)". So no, I'm not insisted that the search
algorithm is somehow codified in the standard. Point of my all post was
that <> search doesn't fallback to "" search as Alberto said, but
quite opposite.
Good luck!
Vitaly
