> On 6 Mar 2015, at 16:03, Cantor, Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 3/6/15, 10:58 AM, "Gareth Reakes" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Are you still getting that seg fault Scott? Which test? > > No, should have clarified that sorry, I just didn't know how the tests were > run or that you had a real script to run them. I was running them by hand > without knowing what parameters to give them and that doesn't work too well.
Great. So looks like tests all pass with expected results. G
