"Sven Moritz Hallberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ross Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007-02-01 12.14 +0000: >> We could decide on a standard interpretation of version numbers, e.g. >> major.minor.patch. To support this, we'd want wildcards like 1.13.* >> in version ranges. > > Sounds compelling, but will everyone want/agree to follow that scheme?
I think we should just declare such a standard. Very few people care about version numbers outside of ghc-pkg, hackage, and cabal. If we pick something that works for us, I suspect that the majority of people will just go along, as long as it's reasonable. Does anyone want to declare such a standard? :) peace, isaac _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
