Oh, right. That was a wrong copy'n'paste. Sorry. I'm of course working on that "take n" proposal. The wiki page is ATM work in progress. I'll put a formal grammar up until the end of the week. In any case though, I guess the syntax is not the most important part, though having common agreement would be best, of course.
Thomas On 5/28/07, Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 02:22 +0200, Thomas Schilling wrote: > .. and as you probably all know, I am going to implement > cabal-configurations. (And for those who didn't know--SoC stands for > Summer of Code and Google pays me for fixing your problems!) My mentor > is Isaac Jones, aka. SyntaxNinja. > > I'll be working based on this e-mail > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00195.html, as > this is the one linked from the bug tracker. The one you really want is the one you've got linked from the CabalConfigurations wiki page, ie http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00282.html "Configurations proposal, take n" sent by Ian, summarising the proposal that we seemed to agree on. Duncan
-- "Remember! Everytime you say 'Web 2.0' God kills a startup!" - userfriendly.org, Jul 31, 2006 _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
