On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:14:44PM +0000, Alistair Bayley wrote: > > Yes, choosing to use non-empty whitespace (to indicate that a comment > block is not finished) might well be a poor design decision. Another > possibility is to use a line containing a single period as a > continuation line e.g. > > line 1 > . > line 2
I think we do this in Cabal descriptions (copying the design from Debian package's descriptions), so this would be consistent with that. It gets my vote! Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
