-------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: David Waern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: GHC's CPP and Cabal's unlit > Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:43:10 +0100 > > 2008/2/2, Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 14:43 +0000, Duncan Coutts wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 14:25 +0000, Alistair Bayley wrote: > > > > > > > the comment block (like cabal does) > > > > - don't indent code relative to comments, because Haddock doesn't like > > > > this > > > > > > Hmm, we will have to find another solution to this because the H98 unlit > > > spec clearly states that '>' is to be replaced with a ' ', not just > > > deleted. So if haddock barfs on code like: > > > > > > -- a comment > > > > > > some code > > > > So I downloaded takusen and tried this. Haddock does indeed barf. The > > problem is worse though because we do not know how much to indent by to > > fix things. > > I just checked with Haddock 2 and it also doesn't accept > "mis-indented" comments. Fixing this might be possible but it would > need modifications to the GHC parser. It might be better to look at > the indentation level of the code, and use that for the comments. > > David
_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
