At Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:34:41 +0200, Christian Maeder wrote: > > Clemens Fruhwirth wrote: > > Wed Oct 8 08:44:10 PDT 2008 Clemens Fruhwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Also respect the max. command line size in Makefile driven builds > > > > M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC.hs -7 +13 > > M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC/Makefile.hs -1 +1 > > M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC/Makefile.in -1 +1 > > > > View patch online: > > http://darcs.haskell.org/cabal/_darcs/patches/20081008154410-ed0c4-33d531c4ead53107e5447792adc7f251dab605d2.gz > > > > I think passing -s to xargs in Distribution/Simple/GHC/Makefile.in is a > bad idea (as long as max-cmd-line-size is not determined) and was > removed some time ago!
What was the rational? It seems to break any reasonably large package built with split-objs under Windows. And why isn't the correct solution to this to determine the max command line size? Thanks, -- Fruhwirth Clemens - http://clemens.endorphin.org _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
