On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 01:18 +0100, Ross Paterson wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 09:44:53PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote: > > One thing I noticed when importing data into it is that there are a > > small handful of packages that have no entry in the upload log. The new > > server expects to find such an entry so that it knows when the package > > was added. > > > > Ross, the packages in question I think are the ones that you uploaded > > after ghc-6.10 was released including base, containers etc. I'm guessing > > that the normal hackage upload rejected them with some QA complaints and > > that you had to add them by a manual process. > > I've cleaned up the upload log, so it should match the tarballs now.
Thanks very much! > However there are a number of directories that contain documentation > only (or even just symlinks): That's ok, I don't care about those for the moment, only ones with tarballs. I notice the current hackage server does not list those versions on the package pages either. I guess at some point we might think about packages with only docs and no tarball, if only for the benefit of other haddock docs linking to them. Duncan _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
