Hi, On 24 July 2014 16:07, Joachim Breitner <[email protected]> wrote: > > So while Duncan’s Proposal has no such dependency, in Simon’s proposal > there is one. Will ghc-db’s interface be stable enough that the Cabal > developers will be happy to build against a very old version of it?
Cabal's policy is to support versions of GHC that are up to 3 years old, so I think this could be solved with a combination of #ifdefs and automatic testing. _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
