Hi Daniel, On 27 December 2017 at 17:43, Daniel Trstenjak <[email protected]> wrote: > Most likely the stability of the pretty printing of a > GenericPackageDescription > isn't considered that important. > > I just wanted to mention that the order of fields in the stanzas changed > from 'Cabal 1.24/2.0' to the current HEAD.
Yep, I don't think we should spend time on fixing that (especially given how 'cabal format' is not considered stable). But thanks for letting us know, I think I'll mention that in the change log. _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
