Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,My last proposal was for Petal but it did not receive 100% acceptance. We were 3 committers to answer. I was +1, Chris was kind enough to -0 it and Julien was initially +1 but the offline told me that Chris' rationale made sense... :-). IAS (non-committer) liked it too. However, that left me with a bad taste. I find it important that at least all committers agree on the name. Thus this last email to try to find a name we all agree on.
I very much respect your attitude on this issue.
Okay, in order of preference:Can you vote on the following propositions (I've put all the propositions received so far): 1/ Petal, directory name in CVS: "petals", jakarta-cactus-petal-*.zip 2/ No special name (e.g. Eclipse Plugin, StrutsTestCase Framework, etc), directory name in CVS: "integration", jakarta-cactus-plugin-eclipse-*.zip, etc 3/ Plugin, directory name in CVS: "plugins", jakarta-cactus-plugin-*.zip 4/ Front End, directory name in CVS: "frontends", jakarta-cactus-frontend-*.zip 5/ Runner, directory name in CVS: "runner", jakarta-cactus-runner-*.zip 6/ Spine, directory name in CVS: "spine", jakarta-cactus-spine-*.zip 7/ Thorn, directory name in CVS: "thorn", jakarta-cactus-thorn-*.zip I hope there are no other contenders as I would really like to go forward now! :-) Thanks -Vincent
A/ no special name aka integration (2/)
B/ frontend (4/)
C/ petal (1/)
D/ thorn (7/) or spine (6/)
I think both 'Plugin' and 'Runner' are technically incorrect or misleading, and would rather avoid them. Petal, thorn and spine are all in the same category of metaphoric names on which I've stated my opinion already ;-)
--
Christopher Lenz
/=/ cmlenz at gmx.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
