Hi Vincent! ok thanks, I am just thinking ahead for now, and I was wondering if I can use Easymock and eventually Mockmaker and how much time and coding I will need to spend on MO to do an average pure logic test. Should I use Cactus and represent all the object that I don't want to test with MO, so that I do logic test with Cactus? Thanks again, Marco
<>-----Original Message----- <>From: Vincent Massol [mailto:vmassol@;octo.com] <>Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:57 PM <>To: 'Cactus Users List' <>Subject: RE: MO in Cactus <> <> <>Hi Marco, <> <>> -----Original Message----- <>> From: Marco Barcella [mailto:barcella@;appiancorp.com] <>> Sent: 27 October 2002 17:42 <>> To: Cactus Users List <>> Subject: MO in Cactus <>> <>> Hi, <>> <>> I would like to know whether using MO within Cactus tests for <>simulating a <>> JDBC connection <>> or other objects creates any complications and if there is a <>particular <>> approach that <>> is suggested or necessary. Thanks, <> <>No, there isn't any problem with combining Cactus and MO. It's your <>choice to decide what you want to test in integration. You can have some <>tests which focus on testing container interaction but not database and <>thus the db access. <> <>-Vincent <> <>> <>> Marco <>> <>> <>> <>> -- <>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user- <>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user- <>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> <> <> <> <>-- <>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <><mailto:cactus-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> <>For additional commands, e-mail: <><mailto:cactus-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org> <> <> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
