William Schumann wrote:
> Updated webrev including all requested changes with Bing's changes 
> included.
>
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=6590
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~wmsch/bug-6590/
> previous webrev: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~wmsch/bug-6590/oldwebrev
>
> Thank you,
> William

William,

There are two small issues/nits I had pointed out  in my code review 
feedback which you had not addressed.

See below.

How do you want to address these?

I do not require anyother webrev.

Joe

+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-= 

usr/src/cmd/auto-install/auto_parse.c 38 lines changed
+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-= 


Nit: 187-> 224
-----------------------

Please add a CR above the consecutive ai_get_manifest_element_value()
invocations for readibility?
I found this a little hard to read and noticed the <CR> above
calls to ai_get_manifest_element_value elsewhere in the file
improved readibilty.


+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-= 

usr/src/lib/libict_pymod/ict.py 60 lines changed
+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-=+-= 


Issue:
-----------------------

1277                 if status == 0:

if status == 0 is backwards from how this is handled throughout.
and add logging message before return ICT_SVCCFG_FAILURE

Suggestion:

1277                 if status == 0:
1278                         return 0
1279                 return ICT_SVCCFG_FAILURE

Change to:

if status != 0:
    prerror('Unexpected error issuing  svccfg -f command.')
    prerror('Failure. Returning: ICT_SVCCFG_FAILURE')
    return ICT_SVCCFG_FAILURE

return 0



If you don't want to rearrange this to be more consistent with other ICT 
code please issue:
 
   prerror('Unexpected error issuing  svccfg -f command.')
   prerror('Failure. Returning: ICT_SVCCFG_FAILURE')

Prior to:

1279                 return ICT_SVCCFG_FAILURE


Reply via email to