Dave Miner wrote:
> Sarah Jelinek wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>>
>>> Caimaniacs,
>>>
>>> We'll be using the bugzilla sandbox that Stephen's set up on
>>> defect.opensolaris.org/bz as the bug management mechanism for Indiana
>>> (if you haven't created an account yet, please do). To finish setting
>>> things up, we need to agree on a taxonomy for our projects.
>>>
>>> Bugzilla has a 3-level scheme: Classification, Product, Component.
>>> Equating them to Bugster's Product, Category, Subcategory is probably
>>> the simplest thing to do; in the current case, Development and perhaps
>>> Released are being proposed as the global standard for Classification;
>>> Development has already been created. Within that, I'm suggesting we
>>> have the following:
>>>
>>> Product: installer
>>> Component: gui
>>> Component: library
>>> Component: cli (future)
>>> Component: automation (future)
>>> Component: text_ui (future)
>>>
>>> Product: distro_constructor
>>> Component: cli
>>> Component: gui (future)
>>>
>>> I'm sure this is incomplete. Two issues that certainly seem to not be
>>> covered by the above:
>>>
>>> 1. Where to put live CD bugs (e.g. it doesn't boot, nwam doesn't work,
>>> etc.)? Perhaps we need another product for it?
>>>
>>>
>> I think we do need another product for it. But, then we might have
>> confusion about the installer piece of the liveCD which I assume would
>> go under the installer product.
>>
>> Maybe this is just another OpenSolaris release, such as
>> OpenSolaris/liveCD/<component>?
>>
>>
>
> I haven't had time to follow the whole discussion over on tools-discuss
> about the global taxonomy, but I don't think we were going to have
> OpenSolaris as a Classification, so it'd be more like
> "Development/livecd/{boot, application}" or something like that.
>
Ok, sounds reasonable.
sarah
****
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>
>
