Jon K Aimone wrote: > Hi, > > installadm create-client requires both an image directory and a > service name. This raises some questions (I know I've just missed the > explanation somewhere...). > > 1) If the service name is required, why is the image needed? The image > directory was created along with the service in the first place. Isn't > the image path inferred by the service?
defect 6774 > > 2) What happens if a /different/ directory is given? The client then boots the image in that different directory instead of the one already associated with the service. With the redesign work, we're rethinking if this should be allowable based on what the definition of an "install service" should really encompass. -ethan
