Hi Jason, looking at the affected system, the disk in question is labeled with EFI label:
# /opt/install-test/bin/test_td -dv Disk discovery Total number of disks: 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- num | name| vendor| ctype| mtype| rem| lbl| bsize|#of blocks|size [MB]| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 |* c6t0d0| FUJITSU| scsi| FIXED| No| V| 512| 143374738| 70007| 2 | c6t1d0| FUJITSU| scsi| FIXED| No| V| 512| 143374738| 70007| 3 | c6t2d0| SEAGATE| scsi| FIXED| No| G| 512| 143374738| 70007| 4 | swap| unknown|unknown| UNKN| No| G| 512| 16646144| 8128| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Discovery consumes libdiskmgt library to obtain data about slices - looking at libdiskmgt spec, currently tag & flag are only reported for slices on disk labeled with SMI label, but not for disks with EFI label: ... * For slice descriptors the attributes are: * index: uint32 * devt: uint64 * start (block): uint64 * size (blocks): uint64 * * optional attributes * only on slices that have a device ID * deviceid: string * only on slices on media with a VTOC label * tag: uint32 * flag: uint32 * only on slices on media with an EFI label * name: string * efi boolean * only on slices that are mounted * mountpoint: string * only on slices that are on drives shared in a cluster * localname: string ... As currently installation on EFI labeled disk is not supported by the installer, lack of this information doesn't affect the installation process. We will definitely need to evaluate the impact of this once we start supporting installation on EFI labeled disk. Thank you very much for pointing this out, Jan Jan Damborsky wrote: > Hi Jason, > > looking at the report, it doesn't seem familiar or as something we > already saw. > My understanding is that test machine in question was already blown away. > If the issue is reproduced or seen again, might it be possible to take > a look > at the system affected in order to do more investigation ? > > Thank you, > Jan > > > Jason Zhao wrote: >> Ethan, >>> Jason, >>> >>> What is the baseline for these test case? is it 111 or earlier? >> The baseline for test suite was firstly set up on snv_101b and >> updated according to test results on snv_111a. >> >> Please see STATUS.LIST in attachment for detail baseline. >> >> Thanks >> Jason >>> >>> >>> thanks, >>> -ethan >>> >>> >>> Jason Zhao wrote: >>>> Hi, Jan and Quim, >>>> >>>> We run the libtd test suite on PIT after installing latest >>>> snv_111b2 image. >>>> It seems like there are some bugs from the journal. If you have >>>> time, would >>>> you please login to the SUT for investigation. Since I am not sure >>>> what the >>>> password is, I add Quim and install-qe, maybe they can provide the >>>> SUT name >>>> ,password and how to access. Thanks! >>>> >>>> The libtd or test_td could not get all full information about slice of >>>> c6t2d0s0. >>>> It shows "- -" for "idx" and "flg". But through "prtvtoc >>>> /dev/dsk/c6t2d0s2" command, >>>> it get some information that libtd doesn't collect correctly. >>>> >>>> The whole test link, only tc_sliceX scenarios are impacted. >>>> http://diy.ireland.sun.com/cgi-bin/electron/report.cgi?src=/electron/data/reports/16311/757533/report >>>> at 757533 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >From the journal it shows: >>>> =================================================================== >>>> ...... >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 114|wario 21:18:35 Slice discovery for all disks >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 115|wario 21:18:35 >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 116|wario 21:18:35 num | name| idx| flg| >>>> tag| 1st block|#of blocks|size [MB]| >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 117|wario 21:18:35 >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 118|wario 21:18:35 1 | c6t0d0s2| 2| 01| >>>> 05| 0| 143349312| 69994| >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 119|wario 21:18:35 2 | c6t0d0s0| 0| 00| >>>> 02| 0| 143349312| 69994| >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 120|wario 21:18:35 3 | c6t1d0s7| 7| 10| >>>> 08| 3266496| 1424640| 695| >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 121|wario 21:18:35 4 | c6t1d0s6| 6| 10| >>>> 09| 2045376| 1221120| 596| >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 122|wario 21:18:35 5 | c6t1d0s4| 4| 11| >>>> 06| 1231296| 814080| 397| >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 123|wario 21:18:35 6 | c6t1d0s3| 3| 00| >>>> 07| 620736| 610560| 298| >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 124|wario 21:18:35 7 | c6t1d0s2| 2| 01| >>>> 05| 0| 143349312| 69994| >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 125|wario 21:18:35 8 | c6t1d0s1| 1| 01| >>>> 03| 213696| 407040| 198| >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 126|wario 21:18:35 9 | c6t1d0s0| 0| 00| >>>> 02| 10176| 203520| 99| >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 127|wario 21:18:35 10 | c6t2d0s0| 0| - | - >>>> | 256| 143358065| 69999| 520|1 2 15389 1 128|wario >>>> 21:18:35 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - >>>> | - | >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 129|wario 21:18:35 12 | dump| 0| - | - >>>> | 34| 16646110| 8127| >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 130|wario 21:18:35 >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 131|wario 21:18:35 VERIFY_SLICE:Current system slice: >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 132|wario 21:18:35 0 2 00 0 >>>> 143349312 143349311 >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 133|wario 21:18:35 2 5 01 0 >>>> 143349312 143349311 >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 134|wario 21:18:35 0 2 00 10176 >>>> 203520 213695 >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 135|wario 21:18:35 1 3 01 213696 >>>> 407040 620735 >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 136|wario 21:18:35 2 5 01 0 >>>> 143349312 143349311 >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 137|wario 21:18:35 3 7 00 620736 >>>> 610560 1231295 >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 138|wario 21:18:35 4 6 11 1231296 >>>> 814080 2045375 >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 139|wario 21:18:35 6 9 10 2045376 >>>> 1221120 3266495 >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 140|wario 21:18:35 7 8 10 3266496 >>>> 1424640 4691135 >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 141|wario 21:18:35 0 4 00 256 >>>> 143358065 143358320 >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 142|wario 21:18:35 8 11 00 143358321 >>>> 16384 143374704 >>>> >>>> 520|1 2 15389 1 143|wario 21:18:35 ERROR:could not find slice: 0 4 >>>> 00 256 143358065 69999 MB >>>> >>>> ...... >>>> =================================================================== >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Jason >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> caiman-discuss mailing list >>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss >>>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > caiman-discuss mailing list > caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
