Hi Evan,

I have one more question...

Since you are going to try to provide fixit strings for users, is there 
a way we can incorporate the ability to fix the error automatically for 
them in some cases?

thank,
sarah
*****
> Hi Evan,
>
> A couple of comments/questions...
>
> -I assume the crux of the problem for BE error handling was the 
> inability to let users know what went wrong when we made calls to 
> other programs, such as installgrub? Your solution seems geared toward 
> that type of issue.
>
> -Are there issues with error codes for BE functions that need to be 
> addressed as well? The structure you have defined doesn't appear to 
> include BE error codes as part of its definition. Is there a need for 
> this as well, for more general BE errors that do not occur when 
> calling another program?
>
> thanks,
> sarah
> ****
>>
>> Here is the functional/design spec for the BE error and observability 
>> project.
>>
>> It's a first version and does include some design elements for what 
>> will eventually become the error handling and logging service for the 
>> Caiman Unified Design project. However this project is not intended 
>> to provide that error handling and logging but just the beginnings of 
>> it and the ability to mesh easily with it.
>>
>> I would like to get any comments by the end of the day on Friday (8/21).
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -evan
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss


Reply via email to