Yes thanks that help point it to the right repo, it still has not  
finished installing yet.

Ok, why does the 2010.02 dev ai build point to /release?

Should it not point to /dev and it's particular build by default,  
since thats what it is for?

Sent from my iPod

On 31 Aug 2009, at 03:20, Jack Schwartz <Jack.A.Schwartz at Sun.COM> wrote:

> Hi John-Paul.
>
> I'm wondering if the instructions you followed were for 2009.06.   
> Unless you changed things, 2009.06 would have installed 111b because  
> the repo is set by default to pkg.opensolaris.org/release.  The  
> latest release would be at pkg.opensolaris.org/dev.  Check your  
> ai_pkg_repo_default_authority in the AI manifest, that it points to  
> the .../dev repo.  Here are some references:
>
> http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/dev/AIinstall/manifest.html
> http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/dev/AIinstall/associate.html
> http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/dev/AIinstall/faq.html#modifymanifest
>
> I hope that helps,
>   Jack
>
>
>
> John-Paul Drawneek wrote:
>> ok trying to get opensolaris to work since sxce is now going to  
>> become dead.
>>
>> Not having much luck.
>>
>> final managed to get ai to install with out it timing out with b121.
>>
>> But it now boots with the worrying message of:
>>
>>> Boot device: /pci at 7c0/pci at 0/pci at 8/scsi at 2/disk at 0,0:a  File 
>>> and args:
>>> SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_111b 64-bit
>>>
>>
>> I didn't install that?
>>
>>
>>> NOTICE: zfs_parse_bootfs: error 48
>>> Cannot mount root on rpool/51 fstype zfs
>>>
>>> panic[cpu0]/thread=180e000: vfs_mountroot: cannot mount root
>>>
>>> 000000000180b950 genunix:vfs_mountroot+320 (200, 18acc00, 18da400, 1909400 
>>> , 1261538, 18acc00)
>>> %l0-3: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000  
>>> 00000000018accc0
>>> %l4-7: 0000000001261400 0000000000000600 0000000000000200 0000000000000800
>>> 000000000180ba10 genunix:main+c4 (182b400, 180bec0, 182b7c0,  
>>> 185eec0, 1, 1860558)
>>> %l0-3: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000\
>>>
>>
>> so what went wrong?  did i miss the notice that ai is broke in b121?
>> Why is b111b installed when it should have been b121?
>>
>> I did read the instructions, i did follow them - so how did i end  
>> up in this mess?
>>
>

Reply via email to