Clay Baenziger wrote: > Hi Dave and David, > Could I have the blessing 4303 is a blocker? It currently doesn't > meet spec, and will need to be pushed for any criteria other than MEM to > work. I've got two code reviewers who've okayed the changes and they're > minimal changes.
It's a blocker, but I'm not satisfied with the fix. Why are we using a bizarre mix of upper-case in some cases, mixed-case in others, and lower-case in yet others? It'll be impossible for anyone to remember which is the right syntax for each one. Please rationalize and send for re-review. Dave
