Alok Aggarwal wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Evan Layton wrote: > >> Alok Aggarwal wrote: >>> Thinking about this some more, it seems to me >>> that the fix for 6556 should be coordinated with >>> the fix for 4407 otherwise we run the risk of potentially not being >>> able to debug a bad install. >> >> That's true unless we do this fix such that if the install fails or >> hits an error we don't do the auto-reboot. > > Jan's proposal accounts for the auto-reboot to not > be done in case of a failed install. > > But, there are cases (bugs in the code, etc) where a failure might not > be propagated appropriately. The > logs are our only source of information in that case > after the reboot has been done (defect 4407).
If the errors cause us to end up with a system that won't boot after the install how do we get to the log? > > Alok
