Jean McCormack wrote: > jan damborsky wrote: >> Hi Jean, >> >> my apologies for the late comments, please feel to discard >> them if those came post-mortem. >> >> Thank you, >> Jan >> >> >> On 02/25/09 19:23, Jean McCormack wrote: >>> Here's what I'm planning on doing. Please speak up soon if this >>> doesn't look right. >>> This is the result of an office conversation with Ethan and Evan. >>> >>> The name of the service will be svc://system/install/server:default >> >> I am thinking if 'application' category might be more suitable >> than 'system' which is considered to be used for OpenSolaris system >> services: >> >> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/smf-doc/smf-dev/smf-book.html#startd-manifest-name >> >> > But does that really apply here? They say application is higher level > apps like apache. The question is, > are we more of a higher level app or an OpenSolaris system service? > Since we're definitely OpenSolaris > that tends to lead me that way. Anyone else have a thought? >
system is appropriate. Dave >> >>> >>> The method and manifest (svc-install_server and server.xml) will live >>> in usr/src/cmd/installadm. >> >> Looking at the slim_source gate, SMF stuff (methods & manifests) >> are put into separate 'svc' subdirectories - in this case: >> >> usr/src/cmd/installadm/svc >> >> That said, I am not sure this is the right solution (e.g. with respect >> to the goal to follow structure of ON gate), just wanted to point this >> out :-) > > Since my SMF experience aligns with the ON gate I picked accordingly. I > just checked and > coreadm and dumpadm leave their SMF manifest/methods in the base > directory. For ease > of ON checkin as you mentioned, I'm planning on following that methodology. > > Jean > _______________________________________________ > caiman-discuss mailing list > caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
