Ethan Quach wrote:
> Sean,
> 
> With the AI installer, we could potentially use an older svccfg
> to apply a profile to a newer repository and vice versa.
> 

Where would we be doing that?  We don't presently as far as I'm aware.

Dave


>  From this mail, it sounds like the former case would fail?
> 
> 
> thanks,
> -ethan
> 
> 
> Sean Wilcox wrote:
>> Flag Day :  These fixes will integrate in the next few days once the 
>> final RTI is approved.
>>
>> With the integration of the following bug fixes :
>>
>> 6411391 Empty method_context's don't work
>> 5093847 importing a manifest should create method_context properties 
>> even if not set
>> 6517270 partial method context definitions should work
>>
>> <method_context> entries will become more friendly and allow for correct 
>> inheritance of values due to changes in the DTD.
>> These changes require that the SMF repository db be restructured in a 
>> way that old restarter and svccfg implementations will not understand.
>> Tools or procedures that mix the old smf with the new repository 
>> database will cause problems, by potentially intermixing the repository 
>> and smf utilities.
>>
>> ---
>> Backwards BFU across build snv_109 will require a reseed of the 
>> repository with the old svccfg to reload the repository in a readable 
>> format by the old restarter.
>>
>> The following step should be executed after the BFU has completed, and 
>> before a reboot.
>>
>> This step will reboot the system so make sure all conflict resolution is 
>> complete :
>> /lib/svc/bin/restore_repository
>>
>> Note : any modifications to the repository will be lost with this process.
>>
>> In order to save any modifications, the following step can be applied to 
>> those modified services.
>> svccfg export <service name> > <filename>
>>
>> Once the bfu and reseed/reboot have completed, use svccfg import to 
>> apply the exported manifest files.
>> Forward BFU has been modified to use the correct DTD with the correct 
>> svccfg.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss


Reply via email to