David Bustos wrote: > Quoth Dave Miner on Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:25:34PM -0400: >> At the moment I'd think we would treat them as equivalent to site.xml, >> which I presume you're tracking as well? > > I was also thinking of site.xml equivalence, but I'm not planning on > tracking it separately in phase 1. >
So what's the implication of that for upgrades? Dave
