On 06/11/09 10:35, Dave Miner wrote:
> Ethan Quach wrote:
>>
>> Notes and decisions from previous meetings have been posted
>> to the project page here:
>>
>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/auto_install/ai_design/DerivedProfilesProblemStatment/
>>
>>
>
> Regarding note 2, Scope: It seems like we actually would support both,
> based on the proposed separation of the derivation process into a
> separate SMF service; by supplying an alternate instance or
> implementation of that service, a user could do complete, from-scratch
> derivation if that was preferred for their situation. In that case,
> this is really more about what the default, provided capability will
> require of the user, right?
>
> Nit: Note 3 refers to derived profiles a couple of times, where I
> believe we've agreed on "derived manifests" as the term.
>
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
I've corrected the wording in note 3. Thanks for pointing that out.
--
Ginnie
