Hi Ginnie.
Thanks for your comments.
On 06/22/09 16:45, Virginia Wray wrote:
> Hi Jack -
>
> I don't think you should defer the tool as an RFE. I think the project
> should be done in conjunction with the tool. Other than that, I think
> this is much easier to understand.
I put the tool at the top of the section, but since it really is out of
scope of the file structure I focus on what a file structure functional
spec can provide.
Thanks,
Jack
>
> ginnie
>
>
> On 06/22/09 17:04, Jack Schwartz wrote:
>> Hi Ethan and Ginnie.
>>
>> Gentle reminder: if you have any comments/answers on this email
>> please make them before tomorrow.
>>
>> Thanks for your time,
>> Jack
>>
>> Jack Schwartz wrote:
>>> Hi everyone.
>>>
>>> Please find the latest version of the Manifest Inter-File
>>> Organization functional spec. (It is attached as I had trouble
>>> uploading the pdf to the website.)
>>>
>>> It is the result of our meeting last week. There is now one
>>> manifest of three sections.
>>>
>>> There are a few issues still to be worked out or questions I have.
>>> I would appreciate feedback by Monday 6/22 COB.
>>>
>>> 1) Question: Can someone please clarify for me how systems will be
>>> given a unique hostname during an install without derived manifest
>>> project affecting the enhanced SMF profiles? Are we relying on
>>> DHCP, or is there some other mechanism?
>>>
>>> 2) Section 5.2 paragraph 2 talks about a potential issue of an XML
>>> authoring tool rejecting a single file containing a section with a
>>> DTD header in the middle of the document. Are there other issues or
>>> aspects of this issue which need to be brought up?
>>>
>>> 3) I removed the section on criteria used exclusively by the derived
>>> manifests project because I couldn't find anything about in the
>>> derived manifests functional spec. The criteria I am talking about
>>> were to help in the derivation process (e.g. use derivation X if a
>>> system has criteria x and use derivation Y for systems with criteria
>>> y), as opposed to selection of which manifest to use.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jack
>>>
>>> P.S. I've cc'ed Ethan and Ginnie who I think are the most
>>> knowledgable people to answer questions 1 and 3.
>>>
>>
>
>
